Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts

Monday, September 16, 2019

Why Christians Condemn Abortion but Support the Death Penalty

by Pastor Paul Wolff


Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me,
and do not hinder them, for to such
belongs the kingdom of heaven.”

Christians are sometimes called “hypocrites” when they oppose the killing of babies while at the same time also support the death penalty for convicted murderers. The argument says that if Christians (and like-minded people of other beliefs) were consistent in their “pro-life” belief they would oppose all killing. Those who promote this argument think themselves quite clever that they have uncovered this supposed flaw in the logic and reasoning of people who are pro-life. They might be considered clever, except for overlooking one important thing: Justice.

The argument for the hypocrisy of people who are in favor of pro-life policies can be somewhat convincing to some people who don’t consider all the issues involved. The argument is so appealing that some pro-lifers actually do begin to oppose the death penalty for convicted murderers. This, however is not really what their opponents want. No one cares that murderers are spared the death penalty for a life imprisoned. What the critics of pro-lifers really want is for people to support abortion so that they may live an adulterous lifestyle without having to deal with the consequences.

The single reason why pro-life supporters are in favor of killing murderers, but not babies, is justice. This is not some cruel “social justice” which twists right and wrong to achieve a desired outcome, but real, true, justice where the innocent are spared and the guilty are punished. Unborn babies are innocent of any crime, and are deserving of life, while properly convicted murderers have, by their crimes, forfeited their right to life. It is that simple. This is the consistency of the Christian (and like-minded) arguments. We do not believe it is right to kill the innocent, but it is right to punish lawfully convicted murderers for taking the lives of innocent people.


Daniel was condemned to die in the lions’ den
but God kept him from all harm.

The Biblical basis for the support of a lawful death penalty is found in many places in Holy Scripture. God sanctioned a proper administration of death penalty justice shortly after the great flood when He told Noah and his sons, “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made man.” This is further confirmation of the authority which God gave Adam before the fall into sin to rule over the administration of the earth. In the creation account in Genesis 1, God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” As God rules over all creation, man (who was made in God’s image) is given authority to rule over the earth in God’s place. This is done in accord with God’s Law, of course, which is perfectly good and right. Even though the perfect image of God was corrupted in us by the fall into sin, God still gives mankind authority on earth to administer justice to curb man’s murderous sinful tendencies. Man is not given authority to make up his own rules which oppose God’s laws. That is, by definition, injustice, and not justice. “Social justice” is just another example of injustice, not justice, because it not only makes distinctions which God does not make (such as a multiplicity of “races” rather than the one created by God, and a multiplicity of “genders” rather than the two created by God), but because it also picks winners and losers based on arbitrary characteristics rather than on the merit and worthiness of the individual apart from any unrelated characteristic.

The Holy Bible also reinforces God’s allowance of a death penalty in the laws for the Israelites that God gave Moses after the Exodus from Egypt, and in the directions that God gave to Joshua 40 years after the Exodus to take the Promised Land and destroy the pagan peoples living there. Some allowances were made for mercy, however, as in the case of the Gibeonites (see my article on God’s Promises) and a select few others. The merciful nature of God is shown in the fact that God does not say that the authorities of all nations must execute murderers in every instance, but can determine how it is carried out according to their laws. God, Himself, spared the murderers Cain (though he was unrepentant) and King David (who was repentant after confronted by the prophet Nathan).

Here I would also point out the qualifications that I have noted above regarding the capital punishment of convicted murderers. It is important to note that God does not sanction vigilante justice. It is not given to individuals to determine who should die for their (supposed) crimes. The death penalty is only to be carried out by the proper authorities after a proper trial where evidence is given and justly considered. This is good in that the earthly authorities can carry out justice in support and recognition of the sanctity of life, but it is not good when wicked authorities sometimes misuse justice by killing the innocent or by letting the guilty get away with murder. In 1 Kings 21, King Ahab stole Naboth’s vineyard after wicked Queen Jezebel had a couple false witnesses tell lies about Naboth so that he was falsely accused and put to death. God later arranged that Jezebel died a just (and shameful) death, but Ahab was spared the indignity of his evil wife’s death because he humbled himself and repented before the Lord.


God blessed Adam and Eve with children,
and told them to multiply and fill the earth.
From them come all people on earth.

Likewise, God’s desire for the protection of babies both before and after birth is well attested in Holy Scripture. At the creation of man in Genesis 1 Scripture says, “God blessed them and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.’” It is a great blessing that God gives children to parents to care for and to raise. It is only man’s sin which complicates the conception of new life and new people on the earth. Sinful man despises God’s gift of marriage and so engages in illicit intimacy apart from marriage, and despises the miracle of life which results according to God’s blessing. Bastard children who are unwanted by their parents (though not unwanted by God, nor unwanted by childless families looking to adopt) are still a blessing from God and deserve care and protection and love.

Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” (Matthew 19:14) When Jesus said this His disciples had thought that His time was too valuable to waste on children as if they were worth less than adults. Jesus, however, corrected them. God loves children no less than adults, and there is much about a childlike faith that adults would do well to emulate. In Luke 18:17 Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” It is quite telling that while Jesus exalts children and a childlike faith, the world despises children and wishes to kill them in order to satisfy their selfish desires.

In Jeremiah 7:30-31 God tells the prophet, “The people of Judah have done evil in my eyes, declares the Lord. They have set up their detestable idols in the house that bears my Name and have defiled it. They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire – something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind.” Here God is very clear that He detests abortion and infanticide. His people’s idolatry has led them to kill their children, and God strongly rebukes them. Not only did God NOT command nor allow the killing of children, but such wickedness never even entered His mind. It is not that God lacked imagination, but that children are a blessing from God, not a curse. This wickedness of the people of Judah was one of the contributing reasons why God sent the Babylonians to conquer and destroy Judah and take the few remaining survivors into captivity. The only reason why God allowed some to survive was on account of His promise to David that one of his descendants would be the Messiah who would redeem the world from this gross wickedness. Since God does not change forever, may He have mercy on those societies which mercilessly practice abortion and infanticide. God does have mercy, but his patience has its limits, and those wicked societies will face God’s wrath and destruction if they continue in sin without repenting (and that includes the United States of America).
 
John the Baptist worshiped Jesus
before either was born.
Babies deserve protection from conception.

On the other hand, God shows the value of even the smallest people when He told the prophet Jeremiah, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.” (Jeremiah 1:5) Here God not only states that He knew Jeremiah and had a purpose in life for him before he was born, but God states that He is the one who formed Jeremiah in the womb. Children are not “accidents” at any time, but they are formed according to the blessing that God gave Adam and Eve at the beginning. From the moment of conception, children are precious to God and it is not up to us to decide whether they should live or die based on the whims of their parents, or worse, just on the wicked desire of the mother or father apart from the wishes of the other.
 

Now, just because I noted above that babies are innocent of any crime and not deserving of death any more than any other innocent person, that does not mean that they are without sin. King David wrote in Psalm 51:5 “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.” Remember that although at the time he wrote this David had committed terrible sins worthy of temporal punishment, he was still the man who God chose to be the ancestor of the promised Messiah. Jesus was, and is still, known as the “Son of David”. If the great King David, whose descendant is the world’s savior, was sinful from the time of his conception, then we are no better. Babies in the womb need Christ’s salvation just as much as the most revered and respected adult. This is why when Jesus instituted Holy Baptism in Matthew 28 He told His disciples to baptize and teach “all nations” which includes everyone, even infants. This is why the Christian church has baptized infants as well as adult converts from the very beginning. This also carried on a similar practice to the Old Testament Israelite practice of circumcising the baby boys on the eighth day after birth. Even babies need the redeeming power of God to be saved. Christ’s practice of Baptism replaced the practice of circumcision and made it universal for boys and girls, and men and women. 
 
Jesus said, “Whoever welcomes a little child like this
in my name welcomes me. But if anyone causes one of these
little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him
to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be
drowned in the depths of the sea.” (Matthew 18:5-6)

Jesus once called a little child and had him stand among His disciples and He said, “Whoever welcomes a little child like this in my name welcomes me. But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” (Matthew 18:5-6) We do children no favors by aborting them in the womb. Not all aborted children will go to heaven. Many aborted souls will be in hell to torment their murderers. Some aborted children may be in heaven. Just as the infant John rejoiced in the presence of Jesus in Luke 1:41, though both John and Jesus were still in their mothers’ wombs, so some unborn children may believe. The Holy Spirit calls all people to faith, and some may believe, even though they may not yet be fully formed. We also do them no favors in depriving them the joys (and the struggles) of life as believers in this sinful world. 

 
Christians are not hypocrites for trying to save the lives of innocent babies, while at the same time calling for the just punishment of convicted murderers. Christians are not opposed to giving some time for the guilty murderer to repent (such as the time to conduct a fair trial), because Jesus died to pay for the sin of murder as well as all sins. Because Jesus died for all people, there is no reason why the murderer should not be forgiven and receive eternal life, yet, in order to uphold the value of life in our societies, those who wrongly take life forfeit their own. The repentant murderer may die confident that his sins are forgiven by Christ, but for order and justice here on earth, it is sometimes necessary to put people to death for their crimes.



Wednesday, June 12, 2019

The Problem with Sexual Politics


by Pastor Paul Wolff


God instituted marriage
at the creation of Adam and Eve.
Sin made marital relations a struggle.

Sexual politics is the idea that men and women must compete for power in order for there to be equality or justice or fair treatment and the like. There are so many problems with sexual politics that I hardly know where to begin. I will start with the most obvious, though it is so often ignored that we think it is less obvious than it ought to be. Sexual politics is an oxymoron, which is to say it is a phrase which contradicts itself. Sexuality is naturally intimate and personal, and politics is naturally public and common to all. When you try to combine the private with the public what results is chaos, confusion, and insanity.

Sexuality is a gift from God for the purpose of strengthening the marriage bond between a husband and his wife, and for the purpose of filling the world with people through procreation. The sexual act is so personal and intimate that if God had not blessed it and made it pleasurable for both husband and wife, then no one would ever engage in it, and if that were true, and had sin also never entered the world, then the entire world population would still only be two people, Adam and Eve.


The problem with sexuality is that sin has perverted our use of God’s good gift, and turned a wonderful, intimate, private act into a selfish, filthy, perverted, public spectacle. When people give in to the devil’s temptations then we pervert God’s good gifts, and turn them into wicked things. Any use of sexuality apart from the normal use in natural marriage is a misuse of God’s gift which is forbidden by God’s Sixth Commandment (“You shall not commit adultery”). God forbids such acts because, as Scripture says, “Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.” (1 Corinthians 6:18) God’s commandments are all given for our good to forbid us from doing things which hurt ourselves and others, and God’s commands encourage us to do things which are good for others and ourselves.

The devil’s temptations to sexual sins promise to give us physical pleasure without the lifelong commitment required in marriage. The tragic consequences of sexual sins are that they interfere with, and destroy, our relationships with one another, especially relationships between men and women. Sexual sins also ruin the sinner’s view of himself or herself because one who commits sexual sins is sinning against one’s own body as noted above.


Romantic ideas about marriage
are neither Biblical nor sustainable.
Marriage is a lifelong commitment.

Sexual politics turns relationships between men and women into struggles for power. These power struggles are the opposite of loving and are never beneficial for anyone concerned. Even if you “win” the power struggle you lose much more, including friendship, respect, cooperation, companionship, assistance, help, comfort, fidelity, and more. True love is concern for someone else over your concern for yourself. Holy Scripture’s “Golden Rule” is a good guide as to what true love is: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Power politics (especially when applied to the two sexes) are all about what is good for me, not someone else, and that is, by definition, selfish and unloving. No one will think well of you if you gain power for yourself, but everyone will think well of you if you care for others above your own self interest.

Feminism is a main contributor to the problems of sexual politics. Here I will only briefly mention the problems with feminism because it is a topic so broad (pun intended) and complex that it could fill many whole books. Feminism is fundamentally Marxism for women. Especially as it has developed, feminism is completely power politics. Sexual politics is just one troubling aspect of feminism, of which there are many more. Twenty-first century feminists completely reject the ideals of the original feminists. They still can talk a good “equality” game, but hardcore feminists are all about domination, and frequently sneer at the suggestion of equality. Also, don’t even mention accounting for women’s needs and desires for protection in marriage and motherhood. There are many prominent feminists who hold to the idea that a woman has the right to murder her own children, or she isn’t a real feminist. This is so ridiculous that it shouldn’t need comment except for those who advocate for such barbarism with vehement sincerity.


The Holy Family is a
good example of a loving family.

Another problem with the politicizing of sexuality is that it objectifies the pleasure of intimacy and that makes it inherently selfish. When sexual intimacy is based on selfishness then it leads quickly to all kinds of perversions. If someone views sex in political or selfish terms, then all that matters to that person is how he (or she) feels personally. All kinds of sinful perverted acts can make a person feel pleasure if they don’t care at all about the person with whom they are engaging. This leads people to seek their “pleasure” in adultery, fornication, promiscuity, homosexuality, and all kinds of violent perversions including rape and more. There is no end to perversions if someone only cares about the momentary pleasure of sexual stimulation.

Sexual politics also directly leads to murder in many cases. There are news stories every day about murders of passion where the betrayal of a spouse, or an uncaring lover, leads someone to murder. Also the selfishness of sexual politics leads to the most common cause of death in America – abortion. When children are conceived through selfish acts, those children are seen by their parents as unwanted burdens, and the easiest way to eliminate the consequences of one’s selfish actions is to commit murder. No civilized society in the world allows the murder of children in the womb, but such is the wickedness of the human heart that so many societies, though they may be advanced in many ways, allow the barbaric practice of pre-natal murder of children. There is no such thing as a truly unwanted child. There is always someone who is willing and able to care for children otherwise “unwanted” by their parents. Truly civilized societies support and maintain structures and organizations who will protect and provide for the most vulnerable of the victims of sexual politics and the sexual revolution.


Husband and wife are not
faceless, generic partners.
They are individuals committed to one another
for as long as they both shall live.

The problem of gender confusion is a somewhat surprising development and outcome of this topic and it really has made sexual politics absolutely crazy in the second decade of the 21st century. One hopes that sanity will soon prevail, so that gender confusion is just a passing fad, but for now those who combine sexual politics with gender confusion are getting otherwise rational people to do some truly insane things. In some states boys who obviously and falsely claim to be girls have been allowed to participate and have been declared champions in girls sports. Obviously that doesn’t work the other way – girls or women who falsely claim to be male will never prevail at a high level, even when they take body-destroying performance enhancing drugs which would immediately disqualify a boy or a man in the same sport. Men are being allowed in women’s and girls’ private places such as locker rooms and toilet facilities, and this has even gotten so bad that on this issue the President of the United States (Barack Obama at the time) openly expressed his ignorance of the difference between boys and girls even though young children know that this difference exists and is obvious even with casual (not intimate) observation.


Marriage is related to the tree of life
because through marriage (ideally)
the next generation is born and raised
and taught how to be good people.

Related to gender confusion is the idea of homosexual marriage. Homosexuality is probably the origin of much confusion in sexual politics because it replaces the natural complementarity of the sexes with the sameness of the perversion, and tries to pretend that there is no difference between intimacy with the same and intimacy with someone who is sexually complementary. This confusion has also gone to high levels when a slim majority (5-4) of ignorant ideologues on the United States Supreme Court ruled (“Obergefell v. Hodges”) that the States had to allow marriage between people of the same sex. The five justices of the majority were ignorant in this decision because they not only ignored over two hundred years of precedents where the states each made their own decisions about marriage laws, but they also ignored thousands of years of precedent where marriage was only between a man and a woman (or men and women in some cases). The foolish majority ignored all scientific information and common sense that men and women are made for each other. But most importantly for the context of the Supreme Court, they ignored the fact that the United States Constitution and all its amendments do not give the Federal government nor the courts the authority to regulate and redefine marriage.


I always enjoy 50th Anniversary parties.
They are always celebrations of life and commitment,
and show how loving parents produce
good children and grandchildren.

I have to wonder if, because of Obergefell v. Hodges, my marriage to my wife (who is the opposite sex to me, in case there is any confusion) is still legal! There is no definition of marriage in the constitution and there doesn’t need to be because it is obvious to anyone who cares that marriage is between a man and a woman of opposite sexes. But now the Supreme Court has given a “legal” definition of marriage, and it only acknowledges marriage between people of the same sex. Natural marriage does not fit that definition. Already people are losing their jobs and/or being prosecuted (“Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission” for example) for maintaining that true marriage is only between one man and one woman. I remain married to my wife, and will continue in my marriage as long as we both shall live, as I promised, whether or not is is legal for us to do so in this crazy world of sexual politics, but you can see the crazy insanity which results when sexuality is inserted in the political process (no pun intended, honestly).

It is interesting to note the societal fallout which began in the United States shortly after the death of Hugh Hefner. Hefner helped popularize the sexual revolution when he founded the porn magazine Playboy in 1953. Very soon after Hefner died in 2017 we started to hear about women complaining that they had been raped by men in positions of power, but had been afraid to speak out for years in some cases. Some high profile Hollywood actresses started the “me-too” movement to encourage other women to come forward and publicly expose the wrongdoing of powerful rapists and sexual abusers. The timing of the emergence of the “me-too” movement was interesting from a Spiritual perspective, as if whatever demons that influenced Hugh Hefner (and other pornographers) suddenly lost much of their fear-making influence on sexual abuse victims once Hefner died.


King Herod's broken family
caused the holy family to flee to Egypt
and the death of all the children in Bethlehem.

The nature of power politics (with the “help” of Marxist feminism) is such that the “me-too” movement is being turned from an honest search for justice into a weapon against innocent men in power. The most obvious of these was the unsubstantiated (and literally unbelievable) allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. The woman who made the accusations against Kavanaugh was a California Psychology professor who appeared to have been under the influence of hypnosis (or something) so that she would appear to believe the lies she was telling, but it did not help her to give any information which would be believable to objective outsiders. The end result of the attempts to defame Brett Kavanaugh is that his opponents opposed him simply because he is a man, and some of the most radical feminists want to believe that to be a man is equal to being a rapist even when it is not true. Here is a good lesson: if your ideology requires you to lie or dismiss the truth in any way, then it is a false ideology and pursuing it is a waste of time.

The growth in the popularity of pornography and the politicizing of sex has led to the breakdown of the family in affected societies. Since the family is the fundamental foundation of society and civilization, once it has begun to crumble we see the signs that the societies under this destructive influence have also begun to crumble. This is most evident in the United States of America, and in some European countries as well as China (with its one-child policy and enforced abortions). In the USA sexual politics has actively encouraged divorce and the destruction of families. Our prisons are full of fatherless children from broken families. Instead of reversing the breakdown of families which lead fatherless children to lives of violence and crime, sexual politics spurs its adherents to work harder to destroy the foundational structures of society and civilization.

It is somewhat strange that although the USA and some other Western countries have moved to embrace destructive sexual politics, like homosexual marriage, which have never been seen in the history of the world, the push for polygamy is late to the game. Polygamy has been known for thousands of years, and although the lack of enforcement of adultery laws has made the practice of polygamy (or at least, adulterous promiscuity) common, but the legal status of polygamous marriages is still not recognized. We see polygamous marriages in the Holy Scriptures, even among some of the most prominent patriarchs like Abraham and Jacob. Isaac was monogamous and loved Rebekah, his wife, but he seems to be an exception. The Scriptures don’t really condemn polygamy outright, but rather simply define and describe marriage as between one man and one woman for as long as they both shall live. The Scriptures also often show the dysfunctional outcomes of polygamy. When asked about the topic of divorce, Jesus (in Matthew 19) teaches about what God intended for marriage since the very beginning. Divorce was never God’s intention, but because of man’s stubborn sinfulness God allowed divorce in some circumstances (with strict limits) in order to mitigate further sin. Christ’s teaching in Matthew 19 also answers the objections of those who falsely claim that Jesus never forbade same sex marriage. If Jesus taught about God’s institution and blessing of natural marriage when asked about the practice of divorce, then there is no reason to assume he would have taught otherwise when asked about same sex relationships.


God blessed the first marriage
and He still blesses marriages
even of unbelievers.

It is no small thing that the first two people God created on earth were a husband and his wife, who became the ancestors of all people. The perfect relationship between the two didn’t last too long before they were at odds with one another. They fell into sin before their first child was conceived. When God confronted Adam about the guilt of his sin, Adam referred to Eve as “The woman you gave me” (Genesis 3:12), which was a far cry from “bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (Genesis 2:23) which means Adam originally considered his wife to be the best part of him. Yet, even after the fall into sin, there was forgiveness, and Adam named his wife Eve, because she would be the mother of all people (Genesis 3:20). God foretold the problem of sexual politics with His words to Eve in Genesis 3:16, “Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” The problem here is not that the man would rule over the woman, but that she would desire to rule over him, but would not be able to do so. Also, the sinfulness of the man’s rule would also cause problems. Women aren’t the only cause of problems in this world, only about half, by my calculations.


Abraham was not the perfect husband
but God still blessed him and Sarah with a son
who became the ancestor of our savior, Jesus.

It might come as a shock to the sexual revolutionists that Christians are not opposed to sex, but have very healthy attitudes about sex and a proper use of sexuality, and are not hesitant to talk about it at all. It is just that Christian attitudes about sex are in many ways opposite of the revolutionists. When it comes to sex, Christians talk about marriage and intimacy and commitment and faithfulness and love and compassion. It is not about selfish pleasure and technique or any of a number of perversions. Now, it is true that you may find some folks who purport to be Christian who follow the revolutionist party line and speak of sex in terms of perversion, and pleasure, and technique, and politics, and the like, but we call those people heretics. Just because someone claims to be Christian doesn’t make them Christian. If they renounce the clear Scriptural teachings then they are heretics at best, and unbelievers at worst.

Despite the false teachings of Christian heretics, the Holy Scriptures give a consistent view of marriage and sexuality throughout all the books of the Bible. God instituted natural marriage when He created Adam and Eve and blessed them when He said, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” (Genesis 1:28) This did not change after the fall into sin. Sin only brought sinful behavior into the equation which God forbade when He gave the Sixth Commandment (“You shall not commit Adultery.”) The Sixth Commandment affirms natural marriage as good for all people, especially parents and children. Also the Levitical laws for the Israelites affirm natural marriage, restrict divorce, and condemn unnatural relations. There are also New Testament admonitions in favor of natural marriage and against perversions which gratify the flesh over and against God’s institution of natural marriage. God gave these laws and admonitions because strong laws and societal norms favoring natural marriage are what is best for a stable society, and happy productive citizens. This is confirmed by the best scientific research. One may find some research reports which say otherwise, but those have either been shown to be inaccurate, or seriously flawed in their testing procedures or data gathering or manipulation in some way. God’s word remains true and good no matter how much sinful people might wish otherwise. God created people in His image originally and blessed them subsequently. We are always ill served when we act against God’s ways and according to the ways of our own wicked imaginations. God knows what is best for us, and we would do well to live according to God’s directions.
See also my article on “The Problem with Democracy”  

See also my article on “The Problem with Socialism”


Wednesday, March 6, 2019

The Problem with Democracy


by Pastor Paul Wolff


God's Heavenly Kingdom is not a democracy
God rules perfectly for the joy and benefit of all.

Several years ago in a Bible Study at Emmanuel Lutheran Church in Dearborn, Michigan, our current senior Pastor, Joel Baseley, paraphrased Plato’s The Republic when he said something like this: “The problem with democracy is that a simple majority can approve whatever they want. If one vote more than 50% agrees to approve something immoral, then what is immoral becomes law, and the society deteriorates.”

Pastor Baseley’s brilliant paraphrase is even more remarkable when you read The Republic. Because of the question-and-answer style of the prose, Plato is not easily quotable. The first time I read through Book 8 on Democracy I did not see where Pastor Baseley got his quote from. Only a closer reading showed that it is accurate, though Plato’s reasoning is subtle. Plato’s character of Socrates looks at the strengths and weaknesses of Democracy from many different points, and evaluates each one in depth. Also, maybe it is just me, but I frequently found it hard to follow. Sometimes the Socrates character would seem to ask questions which would lead to obvious false answers, but it is possible that he was just exploring the assumed truths of his day in order to show them false.

Nevertheless, in The Republic, in the dialogue between Socrates and Adeimantus (in Book 8), Socrates also notes, “see how sensitive the citizens become; they chafe impatiently at the least touch of authority and at length, as you know, they cease to care even for the laws, written or unwritten; they will have no one over them. … Such, my friend, I said, is the fair and glorious beginning out of which springs tyranny.” Here Plato shows that as long as the majority in a Democracy are willing to elect and submit to good, wise rulers then things will be fine and good, but once the majority refuses to submit to the benevolent elected rulers then they will elect tyrants to rule them. It might seem counter intuitive at first for this to happen, but like all the great ancient philosophers, Plato had a very good understanding of human nature, and his conclusions still explain people’s behavior 2,500 years after he wrote it. This is why modern people ought to read the ancient classics (in addition to the Christian Holy Scriptures).


Our national motto ought to be
a way of life for all people.

There are some (mostly Americans) who think that democracy is the same as freedom, but that is not even close to being true. In the rare cases where democracy upholds freedom it is because other societal influences help make democracy work. We saw the failure of democracy when U.S. President George W. Bush conquered Iraq after the attacks of September 11, 2001. President Bush was naïve to think that democracy would solve all the problems of that predominantly Muslim country which had been ruled for decades by a tyrant. For anyone paying attention it was clear from the start that democracy was never going to work there, and it would quickly devolve into an Islamic hell (i.e. hell for everyone, including the followers of Islam), which it did. One of the problems there was that Islam isn’t just a religion, but it is also a system of government. Those who follow Islam have already given up their freedom to their religious leaders, and the citizens will not rule themselves wisely.

Americans have found that a system of democracy in a predominantly Christian nation with well educated and informed citizens is the best way to ensure freedom and prosperity. But the problem with democracy is that it only takes one vote more than fifty percent of the populace to turn freedom into tyranny and slavery, and prosperity into poverty. Though in practice, it may take far less. In the United States, it apparently may take as few as five votes to take away our freedom. Five people out of three hundred million, and we no longer live in a democracy, but a tyrannical oligarchy. It only takes five people if those five are Justices of the Supreme court, and their grab for power goes unchecked.

Another problem is when the government keeps secrets from the people about things which they need to know. In a democracy, we, the people, must have enough of the relevant information in order to make wise decisions, and when we don’t have it, or have the wrong information, then democracy is thwarted. Likewise, when the news media keep vital information from the people, or gives them false information, then the people cannot make informed decisions, so the majority makes ill-informed decisions. This is why wise people are so upset by “fake news”, which are news companies pushing propaganda instead of news.

Another of the major flaws of Democracy has to do with lawmaking. In a pure Democracy a simple majority (one vote more than half the voters) can determine what is legal and what is illegal. This would work fine if a majority of the people have the good of all people in mind when they make the laws. However, we live in a sinful world, and sinners are naturally selfish. Selfish people tend to want what they think is profitable for them, but is not necessarily fair for all people. When such selfishness is codified in law this creates not only an inequality in the society, but it creates an injustice. If someone desires to make something immoral legal, then all they need to do is convince a simple majority of the voters to vote for it, and it becomes law.

There is a funny scene in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie (“At World’s End”). The pirates convene a court, and the rule is a simple democracy, but with a stipulation that the pirates can elect a king. The winner of the election doesn’t need a majority of the votes, but whoever gets the most votes wins. It is explained that the pirates have never elected a king because all the pirates only vote for themselves. This is a major fault with democracy. If people only ever vote for themselves and their interests over the general good of the society as a whole, then they will choose unwisely and make foolish decisions, and the society will suffer. A society of pirates is dysfunctional at the best of times, but when the whole society has a pirate mentality then that is bad for all of us.


The residents of this house have filled their brains
with strange chemicals and aren’t thinking clearly.
Voting for yourself is selfish,
and leads to a society full of pirates.

This “pirate mentality” illustrates the Biblical doctrine of Original Sin. Original sin is the sin we all inherit from our parents going all the way back to Adam and Eve. We sin because we are corrupted by original sin. Though some Christians would deny it, it is clearly taught in the Bible, and it is easily seen in society. No one has to teach children how to be selfish, it comes naturally because they have been corrupted from the time of their conception. In Psalm 51:5, King David noted, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.” This did not distinguish David from anyone else on earth (except Jesus), but it is common to us all. We see the result of original sin in the corruption and violence of the people who lived before the great flood in the days of Noah. In the early days (see Genesis 6), the people were distinguished between the Sons of God (those faithful to God) and the children of men (the unbelieving descendants of Cain), but gradually even the believers were seduced to wickedness and unbelief. The result of their unbelief was great violence upon the earth (Genesis 6:11). The people did what they wanted to do (see my August 2018 article, How to Avoid Going Your Own Way to Hell) which was democratic in its way, but it resulted in violence and evil. Original sin makes simple democracy end in tragedy sooner or later.


Our inherited sin (Original Sin)
corrupts all our governments and all our
interactions with people.

In the Bible God does not prescribe any particular form of government for all people. We are encouraged to submit to the worldly authorities as much as we can, though, in case of conflict with God’s law, “We must obey God rather than man.” (Acts 5:29). If we are forming a government ourselves, then we can take some lessons from how God organized Israelite society after the Exodus in the days of Moses. We should be careful how we do this, however. Many of the laws and ordinances of Ancient Israel were unique to them, and were prophetically and typologically pointed to their fulfillment in Christ, so that the Israelites (or those in Israel who still believed God’s Word) would recognize the Messiah when He fulfilled them. Once Jesus fulfilled the prophetic laws (such as becoming the One, true, atonement sacrifice which paid for the sins of the world) then those laws were no longer required to be practiced by believers.

When God first gave the Ten Commandments to the people, He began by saying, “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. You shall have no other gods before me.” (Exodus 20:2-3) Here God was telling the people to obey Him first of all. There is no democracy in this. We don’t get to choose what is right and what is wrong. God created us and knows what is best for us. God’s Law is right and best, and when our laws are in line with God’s Law then they are good and right. If our laws contradict God’s Law, then it doesn’t matter if the whole world elects to approve something immoral, it is still wrong.

If all the people and all the leaders put God first, above all else, then we would have a truly good and just government, and a peaceful, obedient, productive citizenry who govern themselves well. Citizens who govern themselves well are well governed. However, citizens who do not control themselves well require a much stronger government to maintain peace and prosperity. Note also that when God gave His commandments He reminded the people of His love for them. God is the one who rescues His people from slavery and captivity. God’s primacy in our lives, and in our governance isn’t just because He is our creator and God (though that is sufficient), but that He cares for us and rescues us from tyranny and oppression, along with sin and death, too.

There will always be inequality in society because people have different abilities, capacities, talents, desires, and the like. If the law is fair to all people, then people can prosper in a fair way according to their abilities and desires, even if it is not all equal, and that is enough to make people content. If the law unfairly favors some people over others, then those who are favored will prosper out of proportion with their abilities, and others will fail to prosper while working much harder to make a living. This is always unjust, and results in slavery, or serfdom, or oppression.


If we live by God’s Law
then we can rule ourselves wisely first,
and we can likewise choose wise people to govern us.

Sinners like to imagine that if they were God they would make laws that only benefited them and enslaved all other people. God’s law doesn’t work like this. God is holy and just and righteous and loving, and His law is good for all people. God does not need, nor does He desire, to make us His slaves. It is true that there is much talk in the Scriptures about serving God. For example, Psalm 2:11 says, “Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.” But because God loves us and wants what is best for us, serving Him results in our freedom from worldly oppression and enslavement. Psalm 37:28-29 says, “For the Lord loves justice; he will not forsake his saints. They are preserved forever, but the children of the wicked shall be cut off. The righteous shall inherit the land and dwell upon it forever.” It seems counter intuitive to our sinful, selfish minds, but serving God not only makes us free, but it results in our salvation from sin and death. Although God made us to serve Him, He loves us as His children, and it was out of that love that God became a man in Jesus Christ and lived a humble life of service to God, the Father, and us, in order to redeem us from our sins.

Sinners often rebel against God’s law because they imagine that they would be better off serving themselves than God. However, the sinful nature is a wicked taskmaster, and the person who is his own master actually enslaves himself to his base desires and is much worse off than the person who serves God. It is a paradox, but the one who serves God is free, while the one who serves himself is enslaved. Psalm 34:9-10 says, “Fear the Lord, you his saints, for those who fear him lack nothing. The lions may grow weak and hungry, but those who seek the Lord lack no good thing.”

In the United States of America we have been fortunate that our founding fathers were wise in creating the laws of our land to make them fair, and instituting checks and balances on abuse of power so that they would stay fair for a long time. This, combined with a basis of Christian (or Christian influenced) rationalism which encouraged strong education, made sure that the voting citizens made and kept good laws which were generally fair.


God’s Commandments do not bring us salvation,
but they are given to us for our good
and can lead us to lead peaceful lives with our neighbors.

The laws of the United States were never perfect, but it was our laws that made the American people free enough to become the greatest country on earth in the 20th century. It actually took a great deal of effort, however, to get there. The practice of indentured servitude in the 18th century colonial period eventually became permanent slavery in some of the states, though not all. In the states that permitted slavery the majority of voters determined that it would be profitable if a minority of the population would be a permanent slave class. In some sense, this profited the slave owners greatly, and even some of the free men who didn’t own slaves may have profited to a lesser degree. However, when it came to the Civil War, the North won because it had prospered much more than the South because all citizens were free. The Union not only had greater wealth and manufacturing abilities, but it had a population who cared enough for the concept of freedom and “justice for all” that large numbers of their men were willing to volunteer to fight and to die to bring freedom and equality to all people in the Confederate states, not just a certain class of people. It is also true that, after the war, poor Federal oversight allowed Southern Democrats to keep some vestiges of oppression and slavery alive for a full century after the Civil War in the “Jim Crow laws”, but even then, the impoverished citizens were free to migrate north and prosper in the boom times of the 20th century.

The last verse in the Biblical book of Judges says, “In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” In America we might be tempted to think that this is the democratic ideal, but in truth this is democracy gone wrong. American history shows that our forefathers rebelled against a tyrannical king and set up a better government in place of King George III, and that government included a form of democracy. However, the refrain in the last four chapters of Judges that there was no king in Israel is not a statement of what was right in Israel, but it is a condemning statement. God was Israel’s king, but the people kept turning away from God so that He sent their pagan neighbors to harass them and steal their food and belongings until they repented and turned back to Him as their true King. Also, everyone doing “what was right in their own eyes” is not the democratic ideal, but it is anarchy.


Doing “what is right in your own eyes”
is sure to bring calamity on yourself.
When we live righteous lives according to God’s law
then we can live at peace with others.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, when the U.S.A. was prospering, they did not do “what was right in their own eyes”, but they generally did what was right. When the evil of slavery became too entrenched in the economy of the South, tens of thousands of free white men from the North answered the call to take up arms against their brothers in the South and fought and died to make all men free. This was not doing “what was right in their own eyes” because none of the men who were maimed or died in the American Civil War wanted to lose their arms and legs or die. It was not profitable to be permanently disabled or dead, but they did what was right because it was the right thing to do in God’s sight. It was also the right thing to do for their children and their descendants who followed them. If Americans could enslave a whole class of people just because of a particular shade of their skin, then they could enslave other classes of people such as those of a different shade of their skin (as some 21st century American racists are now openly calling for!) or for any other reason.

The Southern slave owners in 19th century America (and those who secondarily benefited from the free labor of the slaves) only did what was right in their own eyes. It is much more profitable to hire a slave than to pay the man what his labor is truly worth, so that seems right in the eyes of sinful people. It is not right in God’s eyes, however, and we can see that, in a way, the American Civil War was God’s punishment of the U.S.A. for allowing the evil of slavery to endure for too long.

Even worse than the evils of slavery is the evil of abortion which goes on in the United States to this day (as I write this). God have mercy on the United States when He calls our people to account for the evil of abortion. Under slavery, it was neither common nor profitable for slave owners to murder their slaves or their children. However, the evil of abortion is that many Americans think they have the “right” to murder their children so that they can use the money and resources they should be using to raise their children for their own profit instead. This was not enacted democratically, but by the illegal fiat of seven tyrants on the Supreme Court. However in the 46 years since that wicked decision, no democratically elected President, nor Congress, nor subsequent Supreme Court, nor Constitutional Convention has seen fit to right that wrong. As a result, our country is divided as it has not been since before the Civil War. As the beginning of God’s judgment, our country is being invaded by illegal aliens and neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have the will to stop it because they both have significant factions who want to enslave the illegals, or otherwise take advantage of them. There are growing signs elsewhere that the United States is headed towards another Civil War, or worse. Though that may yet be far from a necessary conclusion, we still seem to be heading on that path in 2019 as I write this.


In the days of Noah,
the people did what pleased them,
but this brought God's condemnation on them.
Noah submitted to God and was saved.

When sinners do “what is right in their own eyes” they are sure to commit evil, wickedness, and sin. That is what the corruption of sin does to our human nature. The result is anarchy, rather than benevolence and prosperity. The genius of the American democracy for the first 175-200 years or so of our nation was a great education system based on Christian principles. The U.S. Constitution makes allowances for people’s sinful nature by putting into place checks and balances on all levels of the federal government. When that works it does not let any one branch of government (neither the Judicial branch, nor the Executive branch, nor the Legislative branch) act in a tyrannical way over the other branches. When the Constitution does not work (due to corruption or ignorance of those in power, or even those citizens who participate in the democratic process) then evil abounds and democracy cannot rescue the people from tyranny because the power to do what is right has been taken out of the hands of good people. Plato is quoted as writing, “Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws.” This is why we have checks and balances in our constitution.

God has certainly blessed the United States in the past 250 years. We ought not to take that as an endorsement of democracy. God had His own purpose for our nation, and if we continue to rebel against Him, then He could easily turn His back on us and let us destroy ourselves in civil war, or let a foreign power conquer us or otherwise take control. If God sent the ancient Assyrians to conquer the 10 tribes of Israel and the survivors were so dispersed and assimilated into the peoples of where they were sent that they have disappeared as a distinct people since ancient times, then God would have no problem doing something similar to an unfaithful America. In that case democracy will not be our salvation, but it could be our undoing.

There is much good about the democratic system of society, but it is not in itself the answer to all problems. It is much better at recognizing basic human dignity and personal property than socialism or communism. It is much more free than a monarchy or tyrannical dictator. It is much safer and prosperous than anarchy. Democracy gives people a chance to participate in their governance, and lets them convince others of the rightness of their cause, but without other controls in place, a democratic system can be turned into tyranny when a majority of voters act in ignorance or malice, as sinful people are likely to do.

I should also note here that democracy is not equivalent to protesting. Marching for a cause to inform voters about the rightness of your cause can possibly aid democracy, but it is not necessary for democracy. Just because people are marching in protest for something, it doesn’t mean that their cause is worthy or right. Depending on your cause, the informed voters may reject your cause as being immoral, or otherwise not good for society. You can protest all you want, but if your cause is wrong the voters are free to reject your cause as immoral. That is democracy working as it ought.

The scriptures are clear that believers always have to fight against evil and for what is good, right, and proper. Often the fight begins within ourselves against our own sinful nature. It is not natural for sinful people to want to do good and work for the benefit of others. It was not easy for Jesus to win our salvation either, yet He did it. Though He is the almighty, eternal, creator of the universe, He had to live a humble life and endure the scorn and hatred of His sinful people, and let them nail Him to a cross and crucify Him until He died. But, in doing so, Jesus paid the punishment for our sins, and won for us life and salvation forever. Fortunately we didn’t get a vote to say if we wanted that or not. Both Jew and Gentile sinners turned against Jesus and had Him put to death, but God used that to win our salvation so that Christ gives life and salvation as a free gift to all who trust in Jesus to forgive them from their sins. God’s vote is the only one that counts, but He has elected to save us from our sin, rather than to punish us as we deserve. This is not a bad deal at all. It is the best deal in the world. If people insist on rejecting God’s gift of forgiveness in Christ, then He will let them condemn themselves to torment in hell, but why would anyone do that? It is much better to receive the gift of Jesus and all the eternal blessings which go with it. Whatever we may suffer in this wicked world is small and fleeting compared to the blessings of eternal life in paradise with Jesus.



See also my article on “The Problem with Socialism”  

See also my article on “The Problem with Sexual Politics”


You can read The Republic by Plato online at 
http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html

The Chapter on democracy is here: 
http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.9.viii.html